Thursday, May 23, 2019

Models of Addiction Essay

The addicted person can be a composite of patterns of behavior, predisposition, and social environment. Generally, he is preoccupied with the substance or behavior of choice and forget continue to practice the addiction in increasing amounts of time and material. Cessation results in withdrawal symptoms and discomforts two bodilyly and psychologically. In spite of attempts to cut affirm or cease the activity, the addict will continue to his behavior to his own detriment and destruction. T here(predicate) are many factors that need to be considered when addressing causation, allowing the personates of addiction to decline into three basic categories medical, social, and psychological. Medical ModelsThis model rests on the assumption that disease states are a result of a biological dysfunction, possibly one on the cellular or even molecular level (Doweiko, 2012). The disease or dispositional concept allows the addict to bear no responsibility for the addiction (Jenkins, 2014). Be cause of underlying physical abnormalities, the addict is not able to control the use of the substance or his behavior. This is the primary way of viewing addictions in the United States, according to Doweiko (2012). The cause here is considered biological or hereditary. A problem here is the potential for denial of personal responsibility. heritable factors consider vulnerability, predisposition, and how genes come together to increase risk for addiction. Patterns over time and generations can be helpful in research and in understanding possible solutions. This idea is limited in that research is narrowly rivet on biological and genetic factors versus other factors.Social ModelsThis model views peer pressure, social policies, and availability as major contributing influences surrounding addictions. It is mainly interested with conformance and deviance, what helps, and what is a risk. Unhealthy relationships, dysfunctional families, and environment play a major part in the cause of addiction in this type of model (Jenkins, 2014). Inadequate coping mechanisms and vicarious learning contribute to the problem. The focus is on family, peers, personal relationships, and learned behaviors. The moral volitional or willful sin possibleness relies on social sanctions to remedy addiction and sees it as a weakness of character. The greatest hope here is that changing peers, places, and things offers recuperation.On a spiritual level, the corrupting effects of sin illuminate the need for redemption (Jenkins, 2014). This compulsion is seen as a form of idol worship, as it places the obsession before God. It hinders spiritual harvest-tide and alters the image of God within the believer.Social models are limited in that relationships are difficult to measure (Jenkins, 2014). Rather than how the addiction develops, the emphasis is on recovery. Genetic predisposition and other areas are not taken into account or ignored and the individuals ability to resist is not contem plated. Psychological ModelsWith the attire of psychoanalysis came the psychological models of addiction. The addict is considered as being immature developmentally and as having fundamental traits that contribute to the problem. There is the belief that the dilemma is reinforced both socially and MODELS OF ADDICTION 4 environmentally creating a learned response through classical and operant conditioning (Jenkins, 2014). It is thought that the addict uses defense mechanisms to catch ones breath in denial about his predicament and will use cognitive justifications for otherwise unacceptable behavior (Doweiko, 2012). ConclusionFrom the various models used to understand and condone addiction, it isapparent that there is an overlapping or interconnection among the theories. This would support an integrated approach to identifying the cause and effects of this problem. When all factors are considered, the puzzle is much easier to arrange together. Treatment can then be comprised of m ultiple options and resources making recovery more attainable.ReferencesDoweiko, H. 2012. Concepts of chemical dependency , 8th ed. Belmont, CABrooks/Cole, Cengage LearningJenkins, D. 2014. institution Models of addiction. Retrieved from http//learn.liberty.edu.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.